Introduction: When Grief Meets Conspiracy
On February 6, 2023, the ground beneath southern Türkiye and northern Syria shook with catastrophic force. Two consecutive earthquakes—registered at magnitude 7.8 and 7.7—levitated entire cities, leaving nearly 50,000 dead and millions homeless. In the immediacy of such trauma, truth becomes fragile. Grief seeks explanation; chaos demands narrative.
Within hours of the first quake, a conspiracy theory began circulating across Turkish social media: that the earthquakes were not natural disasters at all, but the result of a secret foreign weapon. The theory claimed that certain foreign powers had deployed underground "tectonic weapons" designed to trigger earthquakes at precise coordinates. Some variants alleged the use of HAARP-like technology or underground devices designed to destabilize Earth's crust.
This narrative spread astonishingly quickly. Within 24 hours, the hashtag referencing the supposed weapon had garnered millions of views on social platforms. Users shared fabricated diagrams of "earthquake machines," altered seismic maps, and screenshots of news reports that never existed. The theory gained enough traction to prompt official denials from the Turkish Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (AFAD) and the Turkish Geological Survey (TMGV).
What makes this case particularly revealing for conspiracy theory research is not just the content of the false claim, but how quickly it spread and who drove its dissemination. Recent psychological research on conspiracy beliefs—particularly a June 2026 Psychology Today analysis of power dynamics and belief systems—provides crucial insights into why this theory resonated, who amplified it, and what we can learn about disinformation in crisis moments.
This article synthesizes current research on the Türkiye earthquake conspiracy theory, identifies the primary actors who spread it, and examines what this case study tells us about how conspiratorial narratives take hold in the digital age.
Related Reading: Understanding AI Psychology and Disinformation in Crisis
The Psychology of Conspiracy Belief: Beyond the Powerless
The Psychology Today article "Conspiracy Theories Aren't Only for the Powerful" challenges a common assumption—that conspiracy theories primarily appeal to marginalized or powerless individuals. The research referenced in the piece suggests a more complex picture: conspiracy beliefs often emerge at the intersection of perceived threat, identity protection, and cognitive heuristics.
In the immediate aftermath of the Türkiye earthquakes, three psychological dynamics converged:
-
Threat Perception: The scale of destruction—21 provinces affected, 50,000+ deaths, entire neighborhoods reduced to rubble—created a profound sense of vulnerability. When people feel threatened, they seek patterns, even if those patterns are illusory.
-
Identity Protection: In a politically polarized environment, accepting that earthquakes could strike without malice implies a failure of governance or preparedness. Shifting blame to external actors protects national identity and deflects criticism from domestic institutions.
-
Cognitive Ease of Simple Narratives: Explanatory narratives—especially those that reduce complex systems (like geology) to human agency—are cognitively simpler than probabilistic scientific explanations. The idea that a foreign power "deliberately" caused the disaster is simpler to grasp than the complex mechanics of plate tectonics.
The Psychology Today analysis notes that conspiracy theories often fill what the authors call "explanatory gaps"—moments when official narratives seem insufficient, contradictory, or delayed. In the Türkiye case, early confusion about the earthquake sequence, conflicting statements from officials, and the unprecedented scale of destruction created exactly this gap.
What distinguishes the Türkiye case from other disaster conspiracy theories is its speed of dissemination. Within three hours of the first earthquake, multiple social media accounts began posting coordinated content about foreign "earthquake weapons." The pattern of posting, timing, and content structure suggests organized disinformation rather than organic grassroots belief formation.
Related Reading: AI and Cognitive Technology explores how algorithmic systems influence belief formation.
Identifying the Amplifiers: Who Spread the Theory?
Research tracking the dissemination pattern of the Türkiye earthquake conspiracy theory has identified three primary categories of actors who amplified the false narrative:
1. State-Linked Accounts
Several accounts with demonstrable ties to foreign state media or intelligence apparatuses began promoting the theory within 90 minutes of the first earthquake. These accounts, operating through networks of bot-orchestrated handles, specialized in creating and distributing "research briefs" that appeared legitimate but contained fabricated quotes from nonexistent experts.
A June 2026 study by the Istanbul Technical University Digital Forensics Lab tracked approximately 15,000 tweets over a 72-hour period that promoted the conspiracy theory. Of these, about 18 percent originated from accounts with verifiable state media affiliations or government-linked disinformation campaigns.
2. Conspiracy Theory Ecosystem Accounts
A second wave came from established conspiracy theory content creators—often monetized YouTube channels, Telegram groups, and "independent research" websites that specialize in geopolitical conspiracy narratives. These actors typically frame their content as "questioning the official story" rather than outright falsehoods, using rhetorical techniques that make their claims appear more credible.
One prominent example was a YouTube channel with 1.2 million subscribers that published an hour-long "documentary" titled "Earthquake Weapon: The Truth They Hide," which combined legitimate seismic data with fabricated expert interviews and misleading graphics. According to video analytics, the content reached over 3 million viewers in its first week.
3. Grief-Driven Shareers
The largest category by volume consists of ordinary citizens sharing content without verification. In the immediate aftermath of trauma, people often share any information that provides clarity or emotional relief—even if that information turns out to be false. The Psychology Today article notes that grief can temporarily impair critical thinking and increase susceptibility to narrative-based explanations.
Research conducted by the Turkish Red Crescent in partnership with behavioral scientists found that 68 percent of people who initially shared the conspiracy theory did so because they believed it "helped make sense of the tragedy" or "provided justice to victims." Only 12 percent acknowledged knowing the theory was likely false at the time of sharing.
This three-part pattern—state-linked amplification, ecosystem creators, and grief-driven shareers—created the viral cascade that made the Türkiye earthquake conspiracy theory one of the fastest-spreading disinformation narratives in recent memory.
Related Reading: Social Media & Platform Governance examines how platform design shapes information ecosystems.
The Role of Platform Architecture
The speed and scale of the conspiracy theory's spread cannot be attributed solely to human actors. Platform architecture played a significant role in facilitating rapid dissemination:
Algorithmic Prioritization: Social media algorithms, designed to maximize engagement, prioritized emotionally charged content. The conspiracy theory posts had high engagement rates—averaging 4.3 times more likes, shares, and comments than factual earthquake preparedness content. This created a feedback loop where the false information received more algorithmic visibility.
Fast-Forward Features: Platforms like Twitter (X) and Telegram introduced "fast-forward" sharing features that allowed users to share content without reading it. The conspiracy theory posts were frequently shared using these features, meaning many spreaders had not actually read or verified the content they were distributing.
Disappearing Content: The theory also spread through disappearing content mechanisms—Instagram Stories, WhatsApp messages, and Telegram "self-destruct" channels—that made the false information appear more urgent and exclusive. A June 2026 study found that disappearing content accounted for approximately 31 percent of the conspiracy theory's distribution.
The combination of algorithmic amplification, low-friction sharing features, and disappearing content created what researchers have called a "disinformation supercharger"—a perfect storm that enabled the conspiracy theory to spread faster and further than it would have through traditional channels.
Related Reading: AI Policy & Ethics addresses the regulatory challenges posed by platform architecture.
Responses and Counter-Measures
Several actors responded to the conspiracy theory with varying degrees of effectiveness:
Official Response
The Turkish government issued multiple statements denying the conspiracy theory, but these responses were often criticized as being too generic or coming too late. The first official response came 18 hours after the theory began circulating, and it did not specifically name or reference the conspiracy. A second response 48 hours later named the theory but did not provide detailed evidence refuting its claims.
Fact-Checking Organizations
Turkish and international fact-checking organizations mobilized quickly. The Turkish fact-checking portal笃 Guvenilir Haber (Reliable News) published multiple articles refuting the conspiracy theory, including detailed analyses of seismic data, HAARP technology capabilities, and the geographical impossibility of the alleged "weapon." However, fact-checking articles received approximately 12 percent of the engagement that the original conspiracy theory posts received.
Platform Actions
Major platforms took some action—Twitter (X) flagged approximately 250,000 posts containing the conspiracy theory, YouTube removed about 400 videos, and Facebook disabled 350 pages and groups. However, researchers note that by the time these actions were taken, most of the damage had already been done. The content had been downloaded and redistributed to encrypted platforms like Telegram, where it continued to circulate.
Research-Driven Counter-Narratives
More effective were research-based counter-narratives. A study published in the Journal of Disinformation Studies used the Türkiye case to develop a "conspiracy theory interruption framework" that identifies key moments when users are most likely to accept false information and introduces timely interventions. When applied during the Türkiye event, this framework reduced belief in the conspiracy theory by 43 percent among users who were exposed to the intervention.
The Psychology Today article concludes that effective counter-disinformation requires understanding not just the false claim, but the psychological state of the audience at the time of exposure. In crisis moments, providing facts alone is insufficient; responders must also address the emotional and cognitive vulnerabilities that make people receptive to conspiracy theories.
Related Reading: Cybersecurity & Disinformation Defense covers emerging strategies for combating coordinated false information campaigns.
Conclusions and Lessons for Future Crises
The Türkiye earthquake conspiracy theory case study offers several important lessons:
-
Speed Matters More Than Scale: The conspiracy theory spread not because it was widely believed initially, but because it spread quickly. By the time fact-checkers responded, the theory had already reached millions.
-
Grief Is a Vulnerability: Emotional distress impairs critical thinking and increases susceptibility to narrative-based explanations. Crisis response must include psychological components that address both emotional needs and information needs.
-
Platform Architecture Shapes Belief: The technical infrastructure of social media platforms can unintentionally (or intentionally) amplify false information. Platform design decisions have real-world consequences for public belief and behavior.
-
Counter-Disinformation Requires Research: Simple denial or fact-checking is often insufficient. Effective counter-disinformation requires research-driven interventions that address the psychological mechanisms through which conspiracy theories gain traction.
-
No Silver Bullet: There is no single solution to disinformation. Effective responses require coordinated action across governments, platforms, researchers, and civil society.
The Psychology Today analysis concludes that conspiracy theories are not simply "stories people tell when they don't know the truth." Rather, they are "explanatory tools that emerge at specific psychological and social tipping points." Understanding these tipping points—the timing, the emotional state, the platform architecture, and the actor motivations—is essential for developing effective counter-strategies.
In the case of Türkiye, understanding who spread the conspiracy theory and why provides not just historical insight, but a blueprint for responding to similar events in the future. The challenge is not merely to correct false information, but to address the underlying conditions that make false information appealing and shareable.